Prospects make 70% of their buying decision before reaching out, and 81% already have a preferred vendor at first contact
The evaluation phase lasts 1-3 months for most deals, with prospects searching across traditional search engines and emerging AI platforms
Being invisible during evaluation costs real revenue. Using a median B2B SaaS deal size of $26K: losing just 1 qualified opportunity per week means $1.37M in potential annual revenue (at 30% close rate, that's $410K lost)
The solution requires a comprehensive content strategy that captures prospects at every stage of their evaluation, not just bottom-of-the-funnel "book a demo" content
.png)
Another qualified lead chose your competitor. You know the one: they fit your ideal customer profile perfectly, spent 45 minutes on the demo asking thoughtful questions, told you "this looks really promising," and then went silent. Two weeks later, you see on LinkedIn they signed with your competitor.
Your sales team is talented, your demos are solid, and your product works. Yet qualified prospects consistently choose competitors. Here's what actually happened: They spent three months researching before requesting your demo. During that time, your competitor appeared consistently in search results while you rarely showed up. By demo time, you weren't competing for their preference; you were validating a decision they already made.
This pattern repeats across your pipeline. Your sales team rehearses pitches and refines objection handling, but nothing changes. The problem isn't the demo. It's that the purchase decision gets made during the months-long evaluation phase you were never part of.
That means by the time a prospect requests your demo, most of their evaluation is already complete. But how long does this invisible decision-making process actually take?
Your sales team isn't failing. They're trying to overcome months of competitor visibility that happened before you knew the prospect existed. The fix isn't better sales tactics. It's winning during the research phase, not after.
So what exactly are prospects doing during these weeks or months of evaluation? And what is this pattern actually costing you?
Most buying journeys follow a similar pattern, though the timeline varies by deal complexity. During this period, prospects are googling questions, comparing options, and deciding who they trust. Here's what happens during a typical buyer's journey, and the real cost of being invisible during each stage.
Month 1: Every Search You Don't Rank For Builds Competitor Trust
In the first month, prospects start googling their problem. Your content is designed for prospects ready to buy, but most start at the top of the funnel, trying to understand their problem and explore solutions.
Look at the disconnect:
What you're likely optimizing for:
What prospects are actually searching:
Meanwhile, different decision-makers search for different things: founders want ROI calculators, technical co-founders want integration docs, heads of growth want case studies with metrics, ops leads want implementation timelines
Your competitor has specific content for each of these searches. You don't.
By month two, prospects expand their evaluation to validate what they've learned and compare options. The gap from month one is now compounding.
Your prospects aren't just using Google anymore. Google holds 90% market share, but AI platforms like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude are experiencing explosive growth. While AI search represents less than 1% of total traffic today, it converts at 4-5x higher rates than traditional search traffic.
If your competitor ranks well and you don't, they're building the same advantage on AI platforms too. The visibility gap compounds across both channels.
By month three, the evaluation is complete and the founder is ready to make a purchase decision.
The psychology here is critical. B2B decision-makers, especially founders spending their own capital, aren't looking for the most innovative solution. They're looking for a trustworthy choice they can defend to their team.
Your competitor's consistent presence throughout their research journey made them feel like the safe choice. You were barely visible and never became a consideration.
The economics are brutal.
Using the median deal size of $26K: losing just 1 qualified opportunity per week to this pattern means $1.37 million in potential annual revenue (52 opportunities × $26,265). Even with a realistic 30% close rate, you're potentially losing $410,000 in actual bookings annually.
Your sales team spends most of their time removing objections instead of demonstrating value, playing defense instead of offense.
But there's a different outcome available, one where you're visible when prospects are searching for answers.
Imagine prospects contacting your sales team saying "We've been reading your content for months, we're ready to buy." That's what happens when you win during the evaluation phase instead of showing up after decisions are made.
The solution isn't perfecting your sales pitch. It's being visible during the months before prospects contact your sales team, capturing trust and preference while they're still forming opinions.
When prospects are at the top of the funnel asking "how does this work?" your content needs to rank for those questions. When they're in the middle of the funnel comparing options, you need to appear in those comparisons. When they're at the bottom of the funnel making purchase decisions, you need to be the company they've seen consistently throughout their journey.
Right now, your prospects are evaluating solutions. Are you visible?
The average B2B buying cycle lasts 11.3 months, though the timeline varies significantly by deal size. Smaller deals typically close in 1-3 months, mid-market deals average 3-6 months, and enterprise sales can extend to 6-18 months or longer. Most of this time is spent in independent research before prospects ever contact your sales team.
Buyers are 70% through their purchasing process before engaging with sellers, and 81% have a preferred vendor before they reach out. By the time a prospect requests a demo, they've already completed the majority of their decision-making through independent research, comparison, and preference formation over weeks or months of evaluation.
Prospects choose competitors who consistently appear in search results during their evaluation because repeated exposure builds trust and familiarity. When they search for answers about their problems over weeks or months, they encounter the same competitor's content repeatedly, making that competitor feel like the safe, trustworthy choice. Companies that aren't visible during this evaluation phase never become considerations, regardless of product quality or sales team effectiveness.
Create educational guides and problem-awareness content for top-of-funnel prospects, detailed case studies and ROI calculators for middle-of-funnel evaluation, and transparent pricing with customer success stories for bottom-of-funnel decision-making. Each stage requires different content that addresses where prospects are in their evaluation process, from understanding their challenges to comparing options to making final purchase decisions.
Monitor your rankings for the questions prospects ask at each evaluation stage, not just bottom-funnel keywords, and track visibility on both traditional search engines and AI platforms like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude. Analyze which competitors appear for your target search queries, identify your visibility gaps, and use analytics tools to understand which content attracts prospects at different funnel stages so you can adjust your strategy accordingly.
RankScience LLC
2443 Fillmore St #380-1937,
San Francisco, CA 94115
© 2025 RankScience, All Rights Reserved
